Biofuels have been around as long as cars have.

A biofuel is a fuel that contains energy from geologically recent carbon fixation. These fuels are produced from living organisms.

Generating Electricity from Wing Waves.

Wind turbines, like windmills, are mounted on a tower to capture the most energy. At 100 feet (30 meters) or more aboveground, they can take advantage of the faster and less turbulent wind.

Producing electricity from solar energy.

Solar energy is a free, inexhaustible resource, yet harnessing it is a relatively new idea. The ability to use solar power for heat was the first discovery.

Turbines catch the wind's energy with their propeller-like blades.

A blade acts much like an airplane wing. When the wind blows, a pocket of low-pressure air forms on the downwind side of the blade.

Solar energy may have had great potential

Solar technology advanced to roughly its present design in 1908 when William J. Bailey of the Carnegie Steel Company invented a collector with an insulated box and copper coils.

We have been harnessing the wind's energy for hundreds of years.

For utility-scale sources of wind energy, a large number of wind turbines are usually built close together to form awind plant.

Biofuels are produced from living organisms.

In order to be considered a biofuel the fuel must contain over 80 percent renewable materials.

Geothermal energy is the heat from the Earth.

Resources of geothermal energy range from the shallow ground to hot water and hot rock found a few miles beneath the Earth's surface, and down even deeper to the extremely high temperatures of molten rock called magma.

Geothermal heat pumps can tap into this resource to heat and cool buildings.

A geothermal heat pump system consists of a heat pump, an air delivery system (ductwork), and a heat exchanger-a system of pipes buried in the shallow ground near the building.

In the future, civilization will be forced to research and develop alternative energy sources.

Possession of surplus energy is, of course, a requisite for any kind of civilization, for if man possesses merely the energy of his own muscles, he must expend all his strength - mental and physical - to obtain the bare necessities of life.

Showing posts with label brightsource energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brightsource energy. Show all posts

Friday, December 20, 2013

A Year After Launch Major Solar Plant Apparently Running At Half Capacity

A Year After Launch Major Solar Plant Apparently Running At Half Capacity
More than a year after the formal launch of the nation's largest existing solar tower power plant, its operators seem to be having trouble keeping it all the way online. According to records provided by California's grid operator, the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System is running at around half its capacity so far in 2015.

The information comes in the form of reports generated by the California Independent System Operator (CaISO), the independent agency that manages most of the state's power grid, as a daily snapshot of which of the state's more than 1,000 power plants are offline, or in CaISO's terminology, "curtailed."

According to those records, each of Ivanpah's three units has been curtailed for between 26 and 29 days so far this year, with the entire plant shut down for ten days. The outages have limited the plant's potential contribution to the state's power grid to half of the plant's rated capacity, and that's assuming that the units worked at maximum capacity when they were up and running.

The curtailment records reflect the status of each of the state's power plants at 3:15 in the afternoon, and thus may overstate a plant's actually downtime: if a plant shuts down for maintenance at 2:30 and is back online by 3:20, CaISO records it as curtailed.

That said, all but half a dozen of the daily curtailments recorded for Ivanpah were described as "planned." Since those planned curtailments occurred on many successive days, it's unlikely that any of them were short-term.

When in operation, Ivanpah's three units each generate power by using thousands of targetable mirrors to focus sunlight on boilers atop three 459-foot towers. That concentrated sunlight heats water to create steam, which drives turbines that generate power. Ivanpah's Units 2 and 3 can generate up to 133 megawatts of power each, while the slightly smaller Unit 1 has a maximum rated capacity of 123.2 megawatts. Any single one of the units being curtailed is thus equivalent to taking a small gas-fired plant offline, at least in terms of the amount of energy that's thus not flowing onto the state's power grid.

A year ago, as most of the renewable energy press lauded the formal launch of the Ivanpah facility, Rewire reported that the plant spent most of January 2014 similarly offline. In October, amid reports that Ivanpah had produced only about one-quarter the amount of power expected since its January 2014 launch, NRG Energy spokesman Jeff Holland told renewable energy reporter Pete Danko that both technical problems and cloudy desert days had impeded the plant's performance, adding:

As with any new plant, there have been some equipment challenges which impacted plant availability, although we have seen a consistent improvement in performance since the plant went on-line earlier this year.

NRG Energy operates Ivanpah on behalf of its business partners BrightSource Energy, which designed the plant, and Google.

That consistent improvement in performance may have faltered, if CaISO's curtailment reports are any guide. Since January 6, the last day this year on which all three of Ivanpah's units were online, Unit 1 and Unit 2 have been either partly or completely offline for 28 days, and Unit 3 for 27 days.

Each of the three units was down for an extended length of time during the first eight weeks of the year. Unit 1 was offline from January 7-30; Unit 2 from January 18 through February 10, and Unit 3 from February 9 through Wednesday. Each of the units was also curtailed on sporadic additional days.

December 2014 also saw a lot of curtailments at Ivanpah, with all three units down for five days that month, and Units 1 and 3 down for 13 and 12 days, respectively.

Asked for an explanation for the apparent extended downtime at Ivanpah in January and February, Jeff Holland of NRG Energy told Rewire that "the periodic curtailments on each unit were for planned inspections and routine maintenance." Holland added that downtime on January 11 was due to work being done on the nearby Eldorado Substation, and that NRG had shut down the plant on that day after being asked to by Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric.

CaISO's curtailment records suggest that Ivanpah has been running at a maximum of 50.07 percent capacity since New Year's. And that doesn't necessarily correspond to Ivanpah's actual power output, which may have been cut even further by more of the Mojave Desert clouds that bedeviled Ivanpah's output in 2014. As the plant relies at least in theory on sales of power to Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric for its income, further curtailments may not bode well for the plant's owners.

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Renewable Energy Dark Cloud Over Solar Plans

"Developers question whether they can finish projects in time to qualify for key federal subsidies. Expiring tax credit may have doomed Palen project."

A rendering of the Palen solar project that was scrapped Sept. 26.

The Obama administration's push for big solar plants and other renewable energy projects on public lands has started to stall as developers question whether they can finish projects in time to qualify for key federal subsidies.

Just days after U.S. Interior Secretary Sally Jewell came to Palm Springs to trumpet the success of these projects in combating climate change, Oakland-based BrightSource Energy abruptly scrapped its plans to build a solar "power tower" project on about six square miles of desert between Indio and Blythe in eastern Riverside County.

The company's Sept. 26 decision was especially surprising because the project was expected to be approved next month by the California Energy Commission.

Joe Desmond, a BrightSource vice president, acknowledged last week that he didn't believe the Palen project, featuring a 750-foot boiler tower heated by mirrors, would be built in time to qualify for a subsidy that would have Uncle Sam pay nearly a third of the cost.

Desmond was referring to a 30 percent tax credit for completed renewable energy projects that's scheduled to drop to just 10 percent Jan. 1, 2017.

Getting the tax credit essentially means getting the financing to build, said Mike Taylor, the research director for the Washington, D.C.-based Solar Electric Power Association.

But now financiers "can't assume the tax credit will be available when the project is done," Taylor said. "They have to assume a worst-case scenario."

Too many things can go wrong for anyone to count on a large-scale solar tower project being built in two years, Taylor said.

Officially, however, BrightSource officials did not blame the subsidy situation for its Palen retreat. The company's official statement said the firm needed to bring forward a different project "that would better meet the needs of the market and energy consumers."

On Monday, company officials declined to discuss the decision.

"We do not have additional comments beyond our statement," said BrightSource spokeswoman Jennifer Rigney in an email.

Taylor, however, said the tax credit is worth hundreds of millions of dollars to Palen Solar Holdings, a partnership consisting of BrightSource and Abengoa Solar in Spain that was formed to build the Palen solar project.

The partnership did not release a cost estimate for the Palen project, but BrightSource's Ivanpah Valley project using similar technology cost about 2.1 billion. That plant, which took about three years to build in eastern San Bernardino County, began operating at the end of 2013.

Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., heads the Senate's environment and public works committee and staunchly supports extending the renewable energy tax credits. She is backing a Senate bill that would extend the 30 percent tax credit to energy projects that have started construction before the end of 2016.

"Utility-scale developers are already beginning to find it difficult to attract investors willing to invest billions of dollars on projects because of the risk that they will not be completed and placed in service before the end of 2016," said a letter dated March 11 in support of the bill. It was signed by Boxer and 33 other senators, mostly Democrats.

The bill has made it to the Senate's Finance Committee. If it goes further, it is expected to face resistance from several Republicans who have rallied against loan guarantees that have benefited the renewable energy industry.

The Palen project would have put about 85,000 mirrors on the ground to focus heat onto a boiler mounted atop the tower. The boiler heats water to make steam, which then turns a turbine to make electricity.

Construction was expected to employ between 600 and 1,200 people, according to a state Energy Commission statement.

The project faced contentious public hearings because this technology was found to burn and kill birds at the Ivanpah plant. The Palen project also would have raised objections from Native Americans, who consider the site to be sacred.

David Lamfrom, the California Desert Program associate director for the National Parks Conservation Association, opposes the Palen project. He said no more tower projects should be approved until more is learned about how Ivanpah is affecting wildlife and other natural resources.

Source: http://www.pe.com/articles/project-751058-energy-palen.html